Identifying King George VI Stamps
St. Helena

The St. Helena King George VI set was printed by Waterlow from 1938 through 1954. Most of the issues were printed multiple times. Each of these printings has visible traits that may help you identify your stamps. This article attempts describe these characteristics for King George VI collectors, but is not a complete description of every issue.

In an article published in George VI (Winter, 2001) several sources of raw data for this issue were compared to determine the actual printings for the Colony. The table included information from these sources:

1. "The Printings of King George VI Colonial Stamps" by W.J.W. Potter in collaboration with Lt. Col. R.C.M. Shelton.

2. The Crown Agents report of printings, as compiled by David Studd. (link to David's .King George VI Philatelic Resource Site)

3. The three catalogs that describe the stamps, including their current numbers for the stamps they describe.

The goal of this article is to show the actual printings that were produced for the Colony, and attempt to help the average collector identify some of the printings. The printings as we understand them are shown below:

St. Helena King George VI Stamps
 

Catalog Numbers
Value Print Date
Color - per Potter & Shelton

CW #
SG # Scott #   Quantity Printed
1/2d  
1/1938 Deep Violet

1

131

118
 

420,000

4/1944 Brighter Violet  

420,000

11/1951 Brighter Violet  

340,020

1d  
1/1938 Deep Green

2

132

119
 

198,000

4/1940 Orange-Yellow

3

132a

119a
 

132,360

4/1944 Deeper Orange-Yellow  

159,300

11/1945 Deeper Orange-Yellow  

89,760

12/1948 Deep Orange-Yellow  

30,000

9/1949 Black & Green

4

149

136
 

211,740

11/1951 Undescribed (New Colors)  

12,000

1-1/2d  
1/1938 Deep Scarlet

5

133

120
 

208,260

4/1944 Rose-Carmine

5a
 

160,020

12/1948 Deep Bright Red  

60,000

9/1949 Black & Pink

6

150

137
 

210,000

2d  
1/1938 Red-Orange

7

134

121
 

208,260

4/1944 Dull Red-Orange

7a
 

160,020

12/1948 Bright Red-Orange  

60,000

9/1949 Black & Deep Scarlet

8

151

138
 

209,100

8/1951 Undescribed (New Colors)  

12,000

3d  
1/1938 Blue

9

135

122
 

126,000

4/1940 Slate

10

135a

122a
 

171,180

4/1944 Light Grey

10a
 

122,580

6/1948 Grey  

53,700

5/1950 Deeper Grey  

71,340

11/1951 Deep Grey  

40,020

10/1952 Undescribed  

12,000

8/1954? Undescribed  

60,000

4d  
4/1940 Deep Bright Blue

11

135b

122b
 

110,000

4/1944 Ultramarine

11a
 

64,740

11/1951 Undescribed  

30,000

6d  
1/1938 Light Turquoise Blue

12

136

123
 

96,000

4/1944 Light Blue

12a
 

32,640

11/1951 Undescribed  

12,000

8d  
4/1940 Sage-Green

13

136a

123a
 

75,000

4/1944 Olive-Green

13a
 

33,900

11/1951 Brown-Olive

13b

136b
 

12,000

1/  
1/1938 Sepia

14

137

124
 

66,600

4/1944 Blackish-Brown  

30,000

12/1945 Colder Blackish-Brown  

12,000

5/1950 Deep Grey-Brown

14a
 

21,960

11/1951 Undescribed  

15,000

2/6  
1/1938 Deep Claret

15

138

125
 

35,700

4/1944 Duller Claret

15a
 

21,600

11/1951 Undescribed  

5,040

5/  
1/1938 Chocolate-Brown

16

139

126
 

25,320

4/1944 Brighter Chocolate-Brown  

16,080

11/1951 Undescribed  

9,000

10/  
1/1938 Deep Purple

17

140

127
 

14,700

4/1944 Deeper Purple  

14,100

12/1944 Purple  

12,000

11/1951 Undescribed  

7,020

Looking over the St. Helena issues, you will note that there are three primary printings:

1. The original 1938 issue. I assume this is the one described by the Catalogs when there is only one printing listed.

2. The 1945 reissue.

3. The 1951 reissue.

In addition to these elements, there are a few odd values that fall outside of this area. These include additional printings of the 1d, 1-1/2d, 2d, 3d, and 1/ values. You should also note that the 4d and 8d issues were originally issued in 1940, not in 1938.

It should also be noticed that new colors of the 1d, 1-1/2d, and 2d were printed in 1949, and in the case of the 1d and 2d values, reprinted in 1951. These can be isolated from the other issues by the color alone.

I believe there are similarities in the paper and gum between stamps printed at the same relative time. The three primary printings can usually be identified based on the variation in the paper and gum. The remaining printings may not be easily identified. However, by the process of elimination and from comparing them to identified issues, you may be able to make an educated guess at the other values.

    Identification of the stamps

Before you try to actually sort stamps, let me tell you how I attempt to make my decisions (guesses if the truth be told). I look at a few characteristics when sorting stamps for the assumed printing. These include:

  • The paper and gum as seen from the back
  • The color of the stamp compared to other stamps of the same value
  • The perforation
  • The watermark
  • The printer who produced the stamps
  • A listing of the actual stamps that were printed. (Like the one shown above.)

For the record, I use artificial lighting (actually twin spotlights with 60 watt soft white bulbs just over my desk). The stamps are compared against black and white paper to help show the contrast. I also try to accumulate a good number of stamps in the hope that by looking at a number of similar items, the contrast from the various printings will be more easily visible.

I will admit that my lights do not show true color, but they do show relative color of one stamp compared to another. I have also purchased an Ott light, and it does an excellent job of showing actual colors. If you are only comparing colors and using a color reference the Ott light might be a better alternative. I tend to use the spot lights to compare the paper and gum (as seen from the back of the stamp). The Ott light is used to determine actual color.

In some cases I have had over 100 stamps of one value to compare. It is amazing how easy it is to see the differences when you look at a large number of stamps compared to looking at a sample of two. That was when these issues were easily accumulated. This is no longer practical due to the extreme interest in the King George VI stamps and shortages which now exist. But I began accumulating KGVI Stamps 20 years ago so it was a lot easier to accumulate unsorted mixtures in those days.

King George VI issues in general tend to have the same watermark: Multiple Crown Script CA (MSCA). This was also used for the later issues of King George V. There is considerable variation in the perforation of some issues, but this depends on the printer - in particular De La Rue who had considerable problems when their facilities were bombed during World War II. So unless there is a noted perforation difference, these factors do not help much with identification of a printing.

The paper seems different for some issues based on the time period when it was printed. This seems to have been caused by material shortages during the War. Generally speaking there appear to be similarities for stamps printed during these relative time periods:

1. 1938-1940 - thicker appearing paper, yellowish gum
2. 1941-1945 - thinner appearing paper, off-white gum
3. 1946-1948 - slightly thicker than the war era, off-white gum
4. 1949-1952 - medium appearing paper, whiter gum

(Note - The appearance is subtle and is best seen against black paper.)

There are also color differences which occur within printings and from one printing to the next one. This was before the days of computer matching, and just like the paper and gum, there were shortages of some materials that are used to make the various colors. You should expect to see color differences within a printing, and from one printing to another.

In my opinion, the paper, gum and color criteria have tended to be the most useful in identifying King George VI stamps (assuming the perforations are not different.). The problem with identification is deciding when these differences are from printing conditions, or from storage and humidity. It becomes an art more than a science.

Now that you have some idea of the general characteristics I study, let's talk more specifically about the issues of St. Helena.

The stamps were produced by Waterlow and Sons. Waterlow printed the stamps of a number of Colonies including: Antigua, Basutoland, British Guiana, Dominica, Grenada (low values), Malta, Turks & Caicos Islands, and others. The Waterlow produced stamps tend to be fairly consistent in terms of the perforation (12.5 Line Perf) and in terms of color. You will not see the wide variation that is found in some of the De La Rue printings like the Bermuda Key Plates for instance.

There does seem to be a similarity between Waterlow stamps printed at about the same time, and it does seem to conform to the time periods listed above. So, to make things simple, you should look closely at the paper and gum in sorting the stamps of St. Helena

Luckily there are three primary printings: the 1938, 1944-1945, and 1949-1951 era's.

The challenge is to find a stamp that can be specifically linked to an era and use it as a reference to sort the other issues.

Here are my candidates:

1938 - 1d Green or 3d Blue.

1944 - 8d Olive-Green (CW description)
This will require some sorting. It falls between the sage-green of the earlier printing and the deep olive green of the later printing. Look for the thinner off-white appearing paper.

1949 - The 1d, 1-1/2d, and 2d color changes .

If you compare the stamps against a black background with good lighting, you may notice some of the traits to the paper and gum that I have observed. These traits are used to make the "identifications - or as some would say - educated guesses".

Generally speaking here is what I have seen:

The 1938 issues will tend to have a yellowish, creamy color to the gum, and the paper will appear to be thicker (it does not show the black through the stamp like the 1944 printings). You might see some cracks in the gum.

The 1944 issues will appear to have thinner appearing paper with off-white gum. The watermark is usually clearly visible when seen against the black background.

The 1949-1950's printings will have a much whiter appearing paper compared to the other issues. (Start with the color changes, and you will have a reliable copy of a stamp that was printed during that time period.

The Tristan da Cunha overprints which were primarily from a different printing were also produced during this time period, and can be used to identify the traits of paper and gum. I would not say that they can be used to identify the colors of the late printings.

Unfortunately, Potter & Shelton did not identify the colors of the stamps from the 1950's printing. I went back to my collection and looked for a white paper issue, and was able to find at least one copy of each issue with white paper similar to the new color printings and the Tristan overprints. In most cases, the stamps looked a little brighter than the other printings - probably due to the whiteness of the paper. I do not know if these will ever become recognized like the Falkland late 1940's white paper issues, but when you look at the quantity printed, these are the scarcest of the St. Helena issues.

I hope this overview helps you sort your stamps. As always be prepared for an update as more information becomes available about these stamps.

Comments or Questions feel free to write

Links to other British Colonial Stamp Sites